Episode

8/17/26 - Why Selling Out to the Left Is a Mistake

Podcast
Mark Levin Podcast
Published
Aug 18, 2026
Duration seconds
6493
Processing state
not_requested
Canonical source
https://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/pdst.fm/e/pscrb.fm/rss/p/claritaspod.com/measure/traffic.megaphone.fm/WWO9707023245.mp3
Audio
https://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/pdst.fm/e/pscrb.fm/rss/p/claritaspod.com/measure/traffic.megaphone.fm/WWO9707023245.mp3
JSON
/v1/public/podcasts/mark-levin-podcast-50417/episodes/8-17-26-why-selling-out-to-the-left-is-a-mistake
Markdown
/podcast/mark-levin-podcast-50417/8-17-26-why-selling-out-to-the-left-is-a-mistake.md

Actions

  • POST https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/mark-levin-podcast-50417/episodes/8-17-26-why-selling-out-to-the-left-is-a-mistake/transcription-requests
    Idempotently request low-priority transcript generation for this episode.
  • GET https://stenobird.com/podcast/mark-levin-podcast-50417/8-17-26-why-selling-out-to-the-left-is-a-mistake.md
    Read the agent-friendly Markdown representation of this episode resource.

Summary

On Monday’s Mark Levin Show, we should encourage independent engagement with ideas like those of Justice Clarence Thomas rather than selling out to the left, communists, socialists, Islamists, the Woke Reich, isolationists, or others who have fallen into traps pushing greater interventionism or abandoning the dollar as the reserve currency. The prevailing hate directed at America, its founders, symbols, belief systems, Judaism, Christianity, and Israel should be condemned. We must maintain constitutional conservatism!  Rep Hakeem Jeffries attacks Justices Sam Alito and Thomas over alleged ethics issues while ignoring Justice Sonia Sotomayor’s corruption. Sotomayor is the most ethically corrupt justice on the Court. She used taxpayer-funded court resources and staff to promote and sell her book by requiring organizations to purchase copies for her speeches, thereby earning substantial profits.  Jeffries shifted from ethics complaints to attacking a Supreme Court decision on the Voting Rights Act of 1965 because Democrats disagree with the ruling and seek to control the Court.  Also, there is no real substantive distinction between the DSA and the Democrat Party. The Democrats, as the more experienced institutional establishment, simply avoid overtly using terms like communism, Marxism, or even socialism while pursuing the same radical American Marxist agenda, differing mainly in approach, style, verbiage, and the speed of implementation rather than the underlying goals. Both seek to destroy the courts, citizenship, the Electoral College, and the voting system; promote open borders with no ICE deportations; centralize power in their own hands; and attack capitalism despite occasional claims otherwise. Later, Rep Randy Fine calls to discuss intense antisemi…