Episode

What can AI teach us about the mind?

Podcast
Many Minds
Published
Mar 26, 2026
Duration seconds
4879
Processing state
not_requested
Canonical source
https://manyminds.libsyn.com/what-can-ai-teach-us-about-the-mind
Audio
https://traffic.libsyn.com/secure/manyminds/What-can-AI-teach-us.mp3?dest-id=1868261
JSON
/v1/public/podcasts/many-minds-510509/episodes/what-can-ai-teach-us-about-the-mind
Markdown
/podcast/many-minds-510509/what-can-ai-teach-us-about-the-mind.md

Actions

  • POST https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/many-minds-510509/episodes/what-can-ai-teach-us-about-the-mind/transcription-requests
    Idempotently request low-priority transcript generation for this episode.
  • GET https://stenobird.com/podcast/many-minds-510509/what-can-ai-teach-us-about-the-mind.md
    Read the agent-friendly Markdown representation of this episode resource.

Summary

Everyone is talking about AI these days. Often these conversations are about how AI might upend education, or work, or social life, or maybe civilization itself. But among cognitive scientists and psychologists the conversation inevitably drifts toward other questions. What does this latest generation of AI tell us about the human mind? Is it putting old ideas and theories to rest? Is it ushering in new ones? Will AI—in other words—also upend cognitive science? My guests today are Dr. Mike Frank and Dr. Gary Lupyan . Mike is a Professor of Psychology at Stanford University, where his lab focuses on language learning and cognition in children. Gary is a Professor of Psychology at the University of Wisconsin–Madison, where his lab studies language and its role in augmenting human cognition. Both Gary and Mike have more recently been thinking a lot about AI and how it is challenging and deepening our understanding of the human mind. In this conversation, we talk about being interested in AI as cognitive scientists—while also being concerned about the technology as people. We discuss the linguistic abilities of frontier LLMs compared to the linguistic abilities of adult humans. We talk about a glaring "data gap" here—the fact that, even though LLMs often rival human abilities, they require orders of magnitude more data to do so. We contrast the capabilities of large language models with so-called BabyLMs. We consider the fact that, as LLMs master language, they also master other abilities—capacities for mathematical reasoning, causal understanding, possibly theory of mind, and more. And we talk about why language might be an especially potent form of input for an AI. Along the way, we touch on reference and the symbol grounding problem, the Platonic Representation Hypothes…