Episode
Why Did We Stop Talking About The AI Apocalypse?
- Podcast
- Machines Like Us
- Published
- Mar 24, 2026
- Duration seconds
- 2814
- Processing state
not_requested
Actions
POST https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/machines-like-us-97796/episodes/why-did-we-stop-talking-about-the-ai-apocalypse/transcription-requests
Idempotently request low-priority transcript generation for this episode.GET https://stenobird.com/podcast/machines-like-us-97796/why-did-we-stop-talking-about-the-ai-apocalypse.md
Read the agent-friendly Markdown representation of this episode resource.
Summary
Just a few years ago, it seemed like all anyone in AI wanted to talk about was existential risk – this idea that an artificial super intelligence could eventually break containment and destroy humanity. More than 30,000 experts signed an open letter demanding a pause on AI development; bills were drafted that would constrain the most powerful new models; and the “godfathers” of AI were travelling around the world, warning anyone who would listen that we were hurtling toward our extinction. And then: we moved on. We started using AI for work, and school, and to plan our kids’ birthday parties. Collectively, we just stopped talking about the end of the world. But Nate Soares didn’t move on. Last year, the artificial intelligence researcher wrote a book with Eliezer Yudkowsky called If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies. As you can probably tell from the title, the book is unequivocal: If we keep going down the path we’re on, it will almost certainly lead to the end of our species. Now, not everyone is convinced of the arguments Soares makes. But if there’s even a chance he’s right, I think we need to hear him out.