Episode
Constitutional Chisme: Strawbridge v. Curtiss
- Podcast
- Legally Ponzaneli
- Published
- Sep 12, 2026
- Duration seconds
- 1673
- Processing state
not_requested
Actions
POST https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/legally-ponzaneli-7758293/episodes/constitutional-chisme-strawbridge-v-curtiss/transcription-requests
Idempotently request low-priority transcript generation for this episode.GET https://stenobird.com/podcast/legally-ponzaneli-7758293/constitutional-chisme-strawbridge-v-curtiss.md
Read the agent-friendly Markdown representation of this episode resource.
Summary
Constitutional Chisme is your weekly mini-episode where your host Stephanie and co-host Harleigh break down the cases you’re most likely to see in law school! This week, we are covering Strawbridge v. Curtiss (1806),trawbridge and other Massachusetts citizens sued Curtiss and a group of defendants who were mostly from Vermont. However, because at least one defendant was also from Massachusetts, the Supreme Court had to decide if federal courts could hear cases where parties on opposing sides shared state citizenship. Use code LEGALLYPONZ to get an additional $100 off whatever sale Kaplan Bar Prep is currently offering! Click the link to support the podcast and keep the chisme coming! Link: https://linktr.ee/legallyponzaneli