Episode
Constitutional Chisme: Liebeck v. McDonald’s
- Podcast
- Legally Ponzaneli
- Published
- Apr 15, 2026
- Duration seconds
- 2329
- Processing state
not_requested
Actions
POST https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/legally-ponzaneli-7758293/episodes/constitutional-chisme-liebeck-v-mcdonald-s/transcription-requests
Idempotently request low-priority transcript generation for this episode.GET https://stenobird.com/podcast/legally-ponzaneli-7758293/constitutional-chisme-liebeck-v-mcdonald-s.md
Read the agent-friendly Markdown representation of this episode resource.
Summary
Constitutional Chisme is your weekly mini-episode where your host Stephanie and co-host Harleigh break down the cases you’re likely going to hear about in law school. Each episode also drops a few easter eggs hinting at what case we’re covering next, so stay sharp. This week, we’re getting into the infamous McDonald’s hot coffee case! What actually happened to Stella Liebeck and why this case is so often misunderstood in conversations about “frivolous lawsuits.” Tap the link to support the podcast and keep the chisme coming! Link: https://linktr.ee/legallyponzaneli