Episode

The Case for Deliberation - 376

Podcast
Left Anchor
Published
Dec 21, 2025
Duration seconds
3240
Processing state
not_requested
Canonical source
https://www.leftanchor.com/e/the-case-for-deliberation-376/
Audio
https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/s6qkeyeq2ycywqni/Left_Anchor_376.mp3
JSON
/v1/public/podcasts/left-anchor-590005/episodes/the-case-for-deliberation-376
Markdown
/podcast/left-anchor-590005/the-case-for-deliberation-376.md

Actions

  • POST https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/left-anchor-590005/episodes/the-case-for-deliberation-376/transcription-requests
    Idempotently request low-priority transcript generation for this episode.
  • GET https://stenobird.com/podcast/left-anchor-590005/the-case-for-deliberation-376.md
    Read the agent-friendly Markdown representation of this episode resource.

Summary

The dumbest people in politics are always going on about how we need more "debate" between various factions. But Stanford political scientist James Fishkin has a much more sophisticated argument that actual deliberation--not cable news morons shouting at each other--has a vital role to play in democratic functioning, and has actually carried out several experiments to that effect. He joins us to talk about his book Can Deliberation Cure the Ills of Democracy?