Episode
Prince Harry v the Daily Mail: has this judgment saved press freedom?
- Published
- Jul 8, 2026
- Duration seconds
- 1342
- Processing state
not_requested- Canonical source
- https://shows.acast.com/law-and-disorder-2/episodes/prince-harry-v-the-daily-mail-has-this-judgment-saved-press
Actions
POST https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/law-and-disorder-news-politics-and-more-from-a-legal-perspective-6759162/episodes/prince-harry-v-the-daily-mail-has-this-judgment-saved-press-freedom/transcription-requests
Idempotently request low-priority transcript generation for this episode.GET https://stenobird.com/podcast/law-and-disorder-news-politics-and-more-from-a-legal-perspective-6759162/prince-harry-v-the-daily-mail-has-this-judgment-saved-press-freedom.md
Read the agent-friendly Markdown representation of this episode resource.
Summary
The judgment has been passed down in a case involving a number of high profile litigants (Prince Harry, Doreen Lawrence and Elton John among them) versus Associated Newspapers, publishers of the Daily Mail. Judge Mr Justice Nicklin dismissed the allegations of unlawful information gathering, in what is being heralded, by some, as a verdict that defends press freedom. For others, however, it will simply license further outrageous behaviour on behalf of private investigators and media organisations. To discuss this, the Law and Disorder team are joined by Charlie Moloney , legal commentator and co-author of McNae's Essential Law for Journalists , and get a dispatch from within the courtroom from Sian Harrison . Law and Disorder is a Podot podcast. Hosted by: Charlie Falconer, Helena Kennedy, Nicholas Mostyn. Executive Producer and editor: Nick Hilton. Associate Producers: Lulu Goad Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.