Episode
Leon Black And The Motion To ID His Accuser (Part 2) (9/5/26)
- Published
- Sep 5, 2026
- Duration seconds
- 658
- Processing state
not_requested
Actions
POST https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/jeffrey-epstein-the-coverup-chronicles-7243585/episodes/leon-black-and-the-motion-to-id-his-accuser-part-2-9-5-26/transcription-requests
Idempotently request low-priority transcript generation for this episode.GET https://stenobird.com/podcast/jeffrey-epstein-the-coverup-chronicles-7243585/leon-black-and-the-motion-to-id-his-accuser-part-2-9-5-26.md
Read the agent-friendly Markdown representation of this episode resource.
Summary
In the case of Doe v. Black (Case No. 1:23-cv-06418), defendant Leon Black has filed a reply memorandum supporting his motion to amend the case caption to reveal the plaintiff's identity. Black argues that the plaintiff's use of a pseudonym is unwarranted, emphasizing the public's right to access judicial proceedings and the importance of transparency. He contends that disclosing the plaintiff's name would not subject her to undue harm or harassment, and that maintaining anonymity could prejudice his ability to mount a full defense. Black further asserts that the circumstances of the case do not meet the criteria typically justifying anonymity, such as matters involving minors or highly sensitive personal information. He maintains that the plaintiff's allegations are already public, diminishing the need for confidentiality. Black requests that the court grant his motion to amend the caption, thereby requiring the plaintiff to proceed under her real name to uphold the principles of open justice and fairness in the legal process. to contact me: [email protected] source: gov.uscourts.nysd.602764.144.0.pdf