Episode
The Vestal Virgins - just how virginal were they?
- Podcast
- Instant Classics
- Published
- Sep 3, 2026
- Duration seconds
- 3246
- Processing state
not_requested- Canonical source
- https://traffic.megaphone.fm/NSR4640654912.mp3
Actions
POST https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/instant-classics-7455513/episodes/the-vestal-virgins-just-how-virginal-were-they/transcription-requests
Idempotently request low-priority transcript generation for this episode.GET https://stenobird.com/podcast/instant-classics-7455513/the-vestal-virgins-just-how-virginal-were-they.md
Read the agent-friendly Markdown representation of this episode resource.
Summary
Few elements of ancient Rome have inspired quite such lurid speculation – by the Romans as well as ourselves – as the vestal virgins. Mary and Charlotte enter the (imaginary) temple of Vesta to separate fact from myth. The Vestal Virgins were six (at any given time) priestesses who tended the eternal flame at the Temple of Vesta - goddess of hearth, home and family. As their name suggests, they weren’t allowed to have sex, although could retire from duties (and marry) at the age of 30. Maintaining chastity was evidently a challenge of the job - or perceived as one - because several vestals were put to death for breaking their vows over the centuries. In exchange for this life of piety, they enjoyed certain privileges - such as being able to sit in the front row of the colosseum - and were power-brokers in Rome, even looking after Julius Caesar’s will (for any Dune fans, think Bene Gesserit!) Charlotte grills Mary about an early article she wrote on the Vestals in 1980, in which she argued that the role of the virgins wasn’t to adhere to traditional notions of female purity, but actually to challenge them - the vestals shared privileges unique to married women, unmarried women and men. They were both gendered and ungendered, which is what makes them so compelling. Fifteen years later, Mary wrote another article which took (slight) issue with her earlier one, questioning to what extent the Romans even had ‘traditional notions’ of gender. Further reading Mary’s landmark (this is Charlotte’s editorialising!) article on the Vestal Virgins (“The sexual status of Vestal Virgins”) was published in the Journal of Roman Studies 1980; her reassessment is in R Hawley and B Levick (eds), Women in Antiquity: New Assessments (Routledge, pb, 1995) Booklength studies of&nbs…