Episode
Why Nordic governments must uphold the global ban on anti-personnel mines
- Published
- Apr 2, 2026
- Duration seconds
- 814
- Processing state
not_requested
Actions
POST https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/icrc-humanitarian-law-and-policy-blog-4241756/episodes/why-nordic-governments-must-uphold-the-global-ban-on-anti-personnel-mines/transcription-requests
Idempotently request low-priority transcript generation for this episode.GET https://stenobird.com/podcast/icrc-humanitarian-law-and-policy-blog-4241756/why-nordic-governments-must-uphold-the-global-ban-on-anti-personnel-mines.md
Read the agent-friendly Markdown representation of this episode resource.
Summary
As security concerns intensify across Europe following the escalation of the international armed conflict between Russia and Ukraine in 2022, several states – including Finland, Poland, and the Baltic countries – have moved to withdraw from the Anti-Personnel Mine Ban Convention (APMBC), while similar calls have emerged in other Nordic countries. These developments reflect a growing perception that existing humanitarian disarmament commitments may constrain military effectiveness in a deteriorating security environment. Yet they also raise fundamental questions about the continued relevance of these commitments at a time when they are most needed. In this post, the Secretaries-General of the Danish, Finnish, Norwegian and Swedish Red Cross Societies argue that withdrawing from the APMBC would not enhance security but risk weakening civilian protection and eroding long-standing humanitarian norms. Drawing on legal, operational and humanitarian considerations, they show that anti-personnel mines remain inherently indiscriminate and of limited military utility, and that their prohibition is fully compatible with modern military cooperation frameworks. They call on the remaining Nordic governments to remain committed to the Convention even – and especially – in times of heightened insecurity.