Episode
When the perpetrator is the climate
- Published
- Mar 19, 2026
- Duration seconds
- 879
- Processing state
not_requested
Actions
POST https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/icrc-humanitarian-law-and-policy-blog-4241756/episodes/when-the-perpetrator-is-the-climate/transcription-requests
Idempotently request low-priority transcript generation for this episode.GET https://stenobird.com/podcast/icrc-humanitarian-law-and-policy-blog-4241756/when-the-perpetrator-is-the-climate.md
Read the agent-friendly Markdown representation of this episode resource.
Summary
Climate change and armed conflict increasingly intersect in humanitarian settings. While the sector is now alert to climate-related risks – particularly in disaster response, resilience programming, and displacement governance – the ways these risks are interpreted and operationalized vary across institutional mandates and operational contexts. In protection practice within conflict-affected settings, climate impacts are still often framed primarily as “conflict multipliers” rather than direct drivers of civilian harm. This narrow lens risks overlooking the very insecurities communities experience most acutely: displacement, restricted movement, isolation, and livelihood collapse. In this post, researcher and former ICRC delegate Lina Aburas argues that our current conflict-centered analysis has a dangerous blind spot. Drawing on her experience in northeast Nigeria, she explores how communities define their own insecurity amid climate and conflict pressures. Practitioner and community perspectives reveal how climate-related hazards reshape mobility, access to livelihoods and assistance, and exposure to protection risks in ways not fully captured by prevailing conflict-centered analyses. Centering these lived experiences reveals that adapting humanitarian action isn’t about mission creep or expanding mandates; it’s about fundamentally shifting how we interpret and prioritize the risks already in front of us.