Episode
The machines must not choose who dies: a humanitarian case for disarming AI
- Published
- Aug 13, 2026
- Duration seconds
- 1131
- Processing state
not_requested
Actions
POST https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/icrc-humanitarian-law-and-policy-blog-4241756/episodes/the-machines-must-not-choose-who-dies-a-humanitarian-case-for-disarming-ai/transcription-requests
Idempotently request low-priority transcript generation for this episode.GET https://stenobird.com/podcast/icrc-humanitarian-law-and-policy-blog-4241756/the-machines-must-not-choose-who-dies-a-humanitarian-case-for-disarming-ai.md
Read the agent-friendly Markdown representation of this episode resource.
Summary
As states race to develop autonomous weapons systems, the effort to agree binding international rules on machine decisions over life and death has reached a critical moment. In this post, Eberechukwu Owuamanam, Jesuit scholastic and humanitarian practitioner, argues that Pope Leo XIV's call to “disarm” artificial intelligence should be taken literally when it comes to such weapons. Writing from a humanitarian perspective shaped by work in the Global South, he contends that no autonomous system should ever select and attack a human being without meaningful human control, warns that automated force will fall hardest on those least able to build or resist it, and calls on states to conclude a binding treaty prohibiting autonomous weapons designed to target people and strictly limiting the rest.