Episode
“A number that learned how not to scream”: the case for community-led metrics on protection
- Published
- Jul 7, 2026
- Duration seconds
- 959
- Processing state
not_requested
Actions
POST https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/icrc-humanitarian-law-and-policy-blog-4241756/episodes/a-number-that-learned-how-not-to-scream-the-case-for-community-led-metrics-on-protection/transcription-requests
Idempotently request low-priority transcript generation for this episode.GET https://stenobird.com/podcast/icrc-humanitarian-law-and-policy-blog-4241756/a-number-that-learned-how-not-to-scream-the-case-for-community-led-metrics-on-protection.md
Read the agent-friendly Markdown representation of this episode resource.
Summary
The international humanitarian system has built a sophisticated architecture for the protection of civilians, namely political resolutions, cluster coordination mechanisms, reporting frameworks, and accountability tools. Yet when conflict-affected people are asked directly whether they feel protected, or whether they trust the actors claiming to protect them, the answer is frequently at odds with the system’s own assessments. Despite commitments under the Grand Bargain to center local actors and affected communities, research consistently reveals a persistent gap between how humanitarian actors evaluate their own performance and how affected communities experience it. In this post, part of our ongoing series “Delivering for people in an evolving humanitarian landscape,” Imane Karimou argues that humanitarian protection faces a trust and legitimacy crisis that cannot be resolved through better coordination or increased funding alone. Drawing on community perception research and the experience of community-centered protection frameworks, she makes the case for reorienting how the system evaluates success, measuring protection through community-reported experiences of safety, trust, and dignity, rather than through system-generated indicators and outputs.