Episode

Episode 5 (BONUS):Academic System vs Irreproducible Science

Podcast
Hypothesize That!
Published
Jul 21, 2026
Duration seconds
839
Processing state
not_requested
Canonical source
https://shows.acast.com/hypothesize-that/episodes/episode-5-bonusacademic-system-vs-irreproducible-science
Audio
https://sphinx.acast.com/p/open/s/67fbe5f67b4fe9379bcfb2cf/e/6a58a236c152a357db14b7db/media.mp3
JSON
/v1/public/podcasts/hypothesize-that-7842584/episodes/episode-5-bonus-academic-system-vs-irreproducible-science
Markdown
/podcast/hypothesize-that-7842584/episode-5-bonus-academic-system-vs-irreproducible-science.md

Actions

  • POST https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/hypothesize-that-7842584/episodes/episode-5-bonus-academic-system-vs-irreproducible-science/transcription-requests
    Idempotently request low-priority transcript generation for this episode.
  • GET https://stenobird.com/podcast/hypothesize-that-7842584/episode-5-bonus-academic-system-vs-irreproducible-science.md
    Read the agent-friendly Markdown representation of this episode resource.

Summary

In this special Crimes Against Innovation episode, host Nicola Hill hears two charges against the research system.   Professor Raj Chovatiya argues that the academic model is putting the brakes on innovation, squeezing creativity and collaboration. Meanwhile, Dr Joe Rastrick condemns the irreproducible published study, which can misdirect future research and waste resources.   Join the debate and decide which crime should carry the greater sentence.   Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacyhttps://acast.com/privacy for more information.   This podcast is produced and funded by UCB.   GL-OT-2600004 – May 2026   Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.