Episode
The Madring Verdict! How Does a Track THAT BAD Get Approved? (E22)
- Podcast
- High Performance Racing
- Published
- Sep 16, 2026
- Duration seconds
- 3567
- Processing state
not_requested- Canonical source
- https://shows.acast.com/highperformanceracing/episodes/the-madring-verdict-how-does-a-track-that-bad-get-approved-e
Actions
POST https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/high-performance-racing-7812001/episodes/the-madring-verdict-how-does-a-track-that-bad-get-approved-e22/transcription-requests
Idempotently request low-priority transcript generation for this episode.GET https://stenobird.com/podcast/high-performance-racing-7812001/the-madring-verdict-how-does-a-track-that-bad-get-approved-e22.md
Read the agent-friendly Markdown representation of this episode resource.
Summary
£151 million, three years of design, 17 months of construction, 353,000 fans… and four overtakes. Madrid certainly put on a show, but Jake, Rob and Otmar have a question: did anyone remember to build a race track? The guys debate whether F1 has become too obsessed with bringing the sport to the people, why fans will happily travel for a great race, and why the best circuits on the calendar were built long before computers, simulations and AI got involved. Rob makes the case for old-school tracks like Suzuka, Spa and Monza, while Otmar argues that Tilke has produced some great circuits, but modern tracks still struggle to match the classics. Plus, Otmar questions how Spain ended up with two races and Germany with none, while the guys ask why Madrid can look spectacular and still feel like almost anywhere else on the calendar. AG1 👉 Head to http://drinkag1.com/hpracing to save £20 on your first month, plus a free welcome kit and five travel packs Eight Sleep 👉 If you’re ready to upgrade your nights and unlock more energy in your days, start with Eight Sleep. Use code RACING for £350 off the Pod 5 Ultra here: https://highpfrmc.com/HPR-eightsleep-au Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.