Episode
Lindsay Clancy's Jurors Were Caught On Someone's Phone?!
- Published
- Sep 4, 2026
- Duration seconds
- 1438
- Processing state
not_requested- Canonical source
- https://audioboom.com/posts/8948629
Actions
POST https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/hidden-killers-live-daily-true-crime-news-breakdowns-5650841/episodes/lindsay-clancy-s-jurors-were-caught-on-someone-s-phone/transcription-requests
Idempotently request low-priority transcript generation for this episode.GET https://stenobird.com/podcast/hidden-killers-live-daily-true-crime-news-breakdowns-5650841/lindsay-clancy-s-jurors-were-caught-on-someone-s-phone.md
Read the agent-friendly Markdown representation of this episode resource.
Summary
The Lindsay Clancy jury was already signaling deep divisions when a new problem arrived from outside the courtroom. A 56-year-old woman was arrested at Plymouth Superior Court for allegedly filming jurors as they left the building. She told reporters she wanted to see Lindsay. Police recovered deleted videos of the jury from her phone. Judge Sullivan questioned each juror individually before allowing deliberations to continue. The jury had already spent days in the deliberation room and had sent multiple deadlock notes. The arrest added a layer of disruption to a panel that was already under extraordinary strain. The legal implications depend on the outcome. A guilty verdict gives the defense grounds to argue that the jury was compromised. A mistrial leaves the incident in the record for any future proceedings. Either way, the arrest forces the court to address whether the jury's deliberations were affected by the knowledge that someone outside was recording them. The incident also raises a broader question about the true-crime spectator culture and its impact on the legal process. Jurors in high-profile cases are increasingly exposed to public attention they never signed up for. A woman with no connection to the case showed up at a courthouse where three children's deaths are being litigated and treated the jurors like subjects in a documentary. Defense attorney and former prosecutor Eric Faddis examines the fallout, the appeal risk, and what courts must do to keep jurors safe from a public that cannot tell the difference between following a case and interfering with one. Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292 Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmat…