Episode
Lindsay Clancy's Attorney Believes THIS Ends It Before a Retrial
- Published
- Sep 16, 2026
- Duration seconds
- 703
- Processing state
not_requested- Canonical source
- https://audioboom.com/posts/8953072
Actions
POST https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/hidden-killers-live-daily-true-crime-news-breakdowns-5650841/episodes/lindsay-clancy-s-attorney-believes-this-ends-it-before-a-retrial/transcription-requests
Idempotently request low-priority transcript generation for this episode.GET https://stenobird.com/podcast/hidden-killers-live-daily-true-crime-news-breakdowns-5650841/lindsay-clancy-s-attorney-believes-this-ends-it-before-a-retrial.md
Read the agent-friendly Markdown representation of this episode resource.
Summary
Kevin Reddington moved within days of the mistrial. The Rule 25 motion he filed on September 10 asks Judge Sullivan to enter a finding of Not Guilty by Reason of Lack of Criminal Responsibility — an acquittal that would prevent the state from retrying Lindsay Clancy. The hearing is September 29. Defense attorney Bob Motta joins the show to analyze the legal and strategic logic behind Reddington's approach. The motion's core argument: the holdout juror reportedly admitted reasonable doubt but refused to apply the court's instructions, which means the mistrial may not have been a "manifest necessity" — a legal finding that, if Sullivan agrees, would bar retrial under double jeopardy protections. Motta explains why legal analysts have called this a long shot but also why Reddington's argument has real weight given the juror conduct multiple panel members have now described publicly. Motta also examines the power dynamic between Reddington and DA Tim Cruz heading into September 29. The 11-to-1 split gives the defense leverage the prosecution didn't expect. Reddington has been publicly aggressive — telling reporters he "crushed" the prosecution, then telling CNN he'd hear what Cruz has to say but won't agree to incarceration. Cruz has said only that his team will address the case "at the appropriate time." The prosecution's trial theory — that Lindsay staged her suicide attempt while arguing she killed because she wanted to die — was reportedly rejected by the overwhelming majority of the jury. Motta walks through whether the state can survive a retrial with the same approach, whether reduced charges and a bench trial represent a more viable path, and what Reddington's public maneuvering tells us about where this case is actually headed. Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: ht…