Episode

Criminal or Crisis? Madness and Liability in the Modena Attack

Podcast: Forensic Psychology
Published: May 28, 2026
Duration seconds: 277
Processing state: not_requested
Canonical source: https://www.spreaker.com/episode/criminal-or-crisis-madness-and-liability-in-the-modena-attack--72209614
Audio: https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/72209614/podcast_1779979029.mp3
JSON: /v1/public/podcasts/forensic-psychology-664800/episodes/criminal-or-crisis-madness-and-liability-in-the-modena-attack
Markdown: /podcast/forensic-psychology-664800/criminal-or-crisis-madness-and-liability-in-the-modena-attack.md

Actions

POST https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/forensic-psychology-664800/episodes/criminal-or-crisis-madness-and-liability-in-the-modena-attack/transcription-requests
Idempotently request low-priority transcript generation for this episode.
GET https://stenobird.com/podcast/forensic-psychology-664800/criminal-or-crisis-madness-and-liability-in-the-modena-attack.md
Read the agent-friendly Markdown representation of this episode resource.

Summary

Following the horrific ramming on Via Emilia, Italian authorities quickly ruled out international terrorism, pointing instead to a severe psychiatric break. However, a crucial legal battle has emerged: the investigating judge recently noted a lack of concrete evidence proving the suspect completely lacked cognitive control during the offense. This episode examines the intricate forensic criteria used to determine criminal responsibility, criminal intent, and whether a psychotic break legally absolves an offender of their actions.