Episode
Ayşe Baltacıoğlu-Brammer, "Boundaries of Belonging: Sectarianism and Statecraft in the Early Modern Ottoman Empire" (Cambridge UP, 2026)
- Published
- Jun 23, 2026
- Duration seconds
- 4490
- Processing state
not_requested- Canonical source
- https://traffic.megaphone.fm/NBNK3510067019.mp3
Actions
POST https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/exchanges-a-cambridge-up-podcast-5610159/episodes/ay-e-baltac-o-lu-brammer-boundaries-of-belonging-sectarianism-and-statecraft-in-the-early-modern-ottoman-empire-cambridge-up-2026/transcription-requests
Idempotently request low-priority transcript generation for this episode.GET https://stenobird.com/podcast/exchanges-a-cambridge-up-podcast-5610159/ay-e-baltac-o-lu-brammer-boundaries-of-belonging-sectarianism-and-statecraft-in-the-early-modern-ottoman-empire-cambridge-up-2026.md
Read the agent-friendly Markdown representation of this episode resource.
Summary
Examining sectarian divergence in the early modern Middle East, Ayşe Baltacıoğlu-Brammer's study provides a fresh perspective on the Sunni–Shi'i division. Drawing on Ottoman Turkish, Persian, and European sources, Boundaries of Belonging: Sectarianism and Statecraft in the Early Modern Ottoman Empire (Cambridge University Press, 2026) explores the paradox of an Ottoman state that combined rigid ideological discourses with pragmatic governance. Through an analysis of key figures, events, periods, and policies, Boundaries of Belonging reveals how political, economic, and religious forces intersected, challenging simplistic sectarian binaries. Baltacıoğlu-Brammer provides a comprehensive historical account of Ottoman governance during the long sixteenth century, focusing on its relationship with non-Sunni Muslim subjects, particularly the Qizilbash. As both the founders of the Safavid Empire and the largest Shiʿi-affiliated group within the Ottoman realm, the Qizilbash occupied a crucial yet often misunderstood position. Boundaries of Belonging examines their role within the empire, challenging the notion that they were merely persecuted outsiders by highlighting their agency in shaping imperial policies, negotiating their status, and influencing the Ottoman–Safavid rivalry in Anatolia, Kurdistan, and Iraq, and western Iran.