Episode

Episode 288 - Close Non-matches

Podcast
Double Loop Podcast
Published
Jan 21, 2026
Duration seconds
4863
Processing state
not_requested
Canonical source
https://soundcloud.com/double-loop-podcast/episode-288-close-non-matches
Audio
https://feeds.soundcloud.com/stream/2251743500-double-loop-podcast-episode-288-close-non-matches.mp3
JSON
/v1/public/podcasts/double-loop-podcast-169275/episodes/episode-288-close-non-matches
Markdown
/podcast/double-loop-podcast-169275/episode-288-close-non-matches.md

Actions

  • POST https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/double-loop-podcast-169275/episodes/episode-288-close-non-matches/transcription-requests
    Idempotently request low-priority transcript generation for this episode.
  • GET https://stenobird.com/podcast/double-loop-podcast-169275/episode-288-close-non-matches.md
    Read the agent-friendly Markdown representation of this episode resource.

Summary

Happy New Year 2026! The boys are back in town, with a new game: Regional Quirkisms. After discussing Minnesota quirkisms, the guys answer a listener question from Ireland: "What's the most number of corresponding minutiae that you have seen from two impressions from different sources?". This leads to a deep dive on close non-matches. The guys share their tips, tricks, and red flag warnings for dealing with close non-matches. They discuss a few examples and talk about the relevant research on this topic.