Episode

Menachot 102 - April 23, 6 Iyar

Podcast
Daf Yomi for Women - Hadran
Published
Apr 23, 2026
Duration seconds
2864
Processing state
not_requested
Canonical source
https://hadran.org.il/daf/menachot-102/
Audio
https://traffic.libsyn.com/secure/hadran/Menachot102.mp3?dest-id=1768700
JSON
/v1/public/podcasts/daf-yomi-for-women-hadran-638456/episodes/menachot-102-april-23-6-iyar
Markdown
/podcast/daf-yomi-for-women-hadran-638456/menachot-102-april-23-6-iyar.md

Actions

  • POST https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/daf-yomi-for-women-hadran-638456/episodes/menachot-102-april-23-6-iyar/transcription-requests
    Idempotently request low-priority transcript generation for this episode.
  • GET https://stenobird.com/podcast/daf-yomi-for-women-hadran-638456/menachot-102-april-23-6-iyar.md
    Read the agent-friendly Markdown representation of this episode resource.

Summary

The Gemara raises a difficulty from the laws of pigul against the principle that "anything ready to be sprinkled is considered as if it were already sprinkled," which implies viewing the act of sprinkling the blood as having already occurred. After resolving this difficulty, the Gemara presents the position of Rav Ashi, who rejects this principle. However, following a challenge from the laws of meilah (mis use of consecrated property), it is clarified that his statement applies only to the laws of ritual impurity of foods; regarding meilah , conversely, Rav Ashi admits that the principle is valid, and the meat is released from the status of meilah the moment it is ready for sprinkling. Subsequently, another difficulty is raised against Rav Ashi from Rabbi Yos i 's ruling regarding the meat of a n asham talui , as Rabbi Yos i - according to Rava's understanding - agrees with Rabbi Shimon that "anything standing to be sprinkled is considered as if it were already sprinkled." This difficulty is resolved by providing an alternative explanation for Rabbi Yos i 's position that does not rely on this principle. Additionally, Rav Ashi challenges the opposing view, and this difficulty is also resolved. The Mishna discusses the laws of deviations in meal-offering vows, detailing the law for cases where an individual vowed or pledged a specific type of mincha but brought a different type instead.