Episode

Chullin 70 - July 9, 24 Tamuz

Podcast
Daf Yomi for Women - Hadran
Published
Jul 9, 2026
Duration seconds
2987
Processing state
not_requested
Canonical source
https://hadran.org.il/daf/chullin-70/
Audio
https://traffic.libsyn.com/secure/hadran/Chullin70.mp3?dest-id=1768700
JSON
/v1/public/podcasts/daf-yomi-for-women-hadran-638456/episodes/chullin-70-july-9-24-tamuz
Markdown
/podcast/daf-yomi-for-women-hadran-638456/chullin-70-july-9-24-tamuz.md

Actions

  • POST https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/daf-yomi-for-women-hadran-638456/episodes/chullin-70-july-9-24-tamuz/transcription-requests
    Idempotently request low-priority transcript generation for this episode.
  • GET https://stenobird.com/podcast/daf-yomi-for-women-hadran-638456/chullin-70-july-9-24-tamuz.md
    Read the agent-friendly Markdown representation of this episode resource.

Summary

The Mishna explains at what stage a delivery is considered a birth (even for a stillborn animal) to determine whether it exempts subsequent offspring from firstborn status, particularly in the case of a difficult birth where the fetus is extracted in pieces. Rav Huna and Raba disagree regarding when the majority of the animal emerges: does the sanctity of the firstborn apply retroactively or only from that moment onward? The Gemara presents two cases demonstrating the practical ramifications of this dispute. A difficulty is raised against Rav Huna's position from our Mishna, but it is ultimately resolved through a reinterpretation of the Mishna. A series of unanswered questions are then raised regarding whether a newborn is considered a firstborn if there is some type of chatzitza (interposition) between the fetus and the womb. The Mishna explains that touching a dead fetus while it is in utero does not convey the impurity of a carcass. However, the Rabbis and Rabbi Yosi haGelili debate whether this exemption applies to all animals - both kosher and non-kosher - or only to kosher animals, and the Gemara presents explanations for each position.