Episode
Chullin 41 - June 10, 25 Sivan
- Podcast
- Daf Yomi for Women - Hadran
- Published
- Jun 10, 2026
- Duration seconds
- 2863
- Processing state
not_requested- Canonical source
- https://hadran.org.il/daf/chullin-41/
Actions
POST https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/daf-yomi-for-women-hadran-638456/episodes/chullin-41-june-10-25-sivan/transcription-requests
Idempotently request low-priority transcript generation for this episode.GET https://stenobird.com/podcast/daf-yomi-for-women-hadran-638456/chullin-41-june-10-25-sivan.md
Read the agent-friendly Markdown representation of this episode resource.
Summary
Three difficulties are raised from tannaitic sources against the opinion of Rav Nachman, Rav Avram, and Rav Yitzchak that a person cannot forbid property that is not theirs ( ein adam oser davar she'eino shelo ), and they are resolved. The first difficulty is from the braita regarding a sin offering slaughtered outside the Temple for idol worship, which the Gemara resolves by explaining that since the sacrifice achieves atonement for the owner, it is legally considered his own property. The second difficulty is from the Mishna regarding two people holding a knife where one slaughters for an idol, and the third is from a braita regarding one who renders another's property impure, mixes it with tithed produce, or pours it as an idolatrous libation. The Gemara resolves these by explaining that the individual has a financial partnership in the item. The Gemara suggests that the debate between Rav Huna and Rav Nachman is a tannaitic dispute, quoting a dispute regarding whether a gentile can forbid a Jew's wine by offering it up as a libation to idols. Rav Nachman, however, rejects the comparison, as a Jew who does the same thing would be doing it just to annoy his friend, and does not really intend to worship the idol. Some difficulties are raised against this theory from tannaitic sources, but are resolved by explaining them as referring to cases where the Jew is an apostate. The Mishna rules that one may not slaughter an animal directly into seas, rivers, or vessels because it looks to others like they are offering it to an idol ( mar'it ayin ). However, it is permitted to slaughter into a circular pool of water, which Rava clarifies must be murky. Furthermore, one may not slaughter directly into a pit ( gumma ) anywhere, but the Mishna then permits doing so in one's hous…