Episode

Chullin 39 - June 8, 23 Sivan

Podcast
Daf Yomi for Women - Hadran
Published
Jun 8, 2026
Duration seconds
2849
Processing state
not_requested
Canonical source
https://hadran.org.il/daf/chullin-39/
Audio
https://traffic.libsyn.com/secure/hadran/Chullin39.mp3?dest-id=1768700
JSON
/v1/public/podcasts/daf-yomi-for-women-hadran-638456/episodes/chullin-39-june-8-23-sivan
Markdown
/podcast/daf-yomi-for-women-hadran-638456/chullin-39-june-8-23-sivan.md

Actions

  • POST https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/daf-yomi-for-women-hadran-638456/episodes/chullin-39-june-8-23-sivan/transcription-requests
    Idempotently request low-priority transcript generation for this episode.
  • GET https://stenobird.com/podcast/daf-yomi-for-women-hadran-638456/chullin-39-june-8-23-sivan.md
    Read the agent-friendly Markdown representation of this episode resource.

Summary

What is the default assumption regarding a gentile's intent when an animal is slaughtered? The rabbis hold that we do not automatically assume a gentile intends it for idol worship unless he explicitly says so, while Rabbi Eliezer holds a gentile's default intent is for idol worship. Rabbi Yosi argues that even if he does intend it for idol worship, we do not say that one person's intent affects another person's act of slaughter. The Gemara presents two ways to explain this dispute and whether the principle of one person intending and another performing the action applies outside the Temple just as it does inside. What is the status of an animal if the slaughter was performed with the intent to perform a later part of the service, like throwing the blood or burning the fat, for idol worship? Rabbi Yochanan rules that the animal is disqualified because we can transfer intent from one action to another, and we learn the laws outside the Temple from the laws inside. Reish Lakish rules that it is permitted because we do not transfer intent from one action to another outside the Temple. The Gemara notes they hold the same argument regarding internal Temple sacrifices and l'shma intent, and then explains why it was necessary to state that they argue in both cases. A difficulty is raised against Rabbi Yochanan and Reish Lakish from Rabbi Yosi's position in the Mishna, but is resolved. A braita is then brought to support Rabbi Yochanan's position. What is the law if someone performs shechita and only thinks about sprinkling the blood for idol worship after the slaughter is finished? The Gemara cites a case in Caesarea where the Sages did not rule whether it was forbidden or permitted. The issue is whether or not a later action or statement retroactively proves the initial inte…