Episode

Chullin 35 - June 4, 19 Sivan

Podcast
Daf Yomi for Women - Hadran
Published
Jun 4, 2026
Duration seconds
2829
Processing state
not_requested
Canonical source
https://hadran.org.il/daf/chullin-35/
Audio
https://traffic.libsyn.com/secure/hadran/Chullin35.mp3?dest-id=1768700
JSON
/v1/public/podcasts/daf-yomi-for-women-hadran-638456/episodes/chullin-35-june-4-19-sivan
Markdown
/podcast/daf-yomi-for-women-hadran-638456/chullin-35-june-4-19-sivan.md

Actions

  • POST https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/daf-yomi-for-women-hadran-638456/episodes/chullin-35-june-4-19-sivan/transcription-requests
    Idempotently request low-priority transcript generation for this episode.
  • GET https://stenobird.com/podcast/daf-yomi-for-women-hadran-638456/chullin-35-june-4-19-sivan.md
    Read the agent-friendly Markdown representation of this episode resource.

Summary

Rabbi Yonatan says in the name of Rabbi that someone who eats a shelishi (third degree) of actual teruma is forbidden to eat teruma but is allowed to touch it. Ulla had said the same thing regarding one who eats a shelishi of chullin that was treated like teruma . The Gemara explains why both statements were needed and could not have necessarily been derived one from the other. Rav Yitzchak bar Shmuel bar Marta says that someone who eats a shelishi of chullin treated like kodashim is still pure to eat actual kodashim , because only real kodashim that are sanctified by an action (like a meal offering when placed in a sanctified vessel or an animal when slaughtered) can create a revi'i (fourth degree). Rami bar Hama challenges this from Rabbi Yehoshua's opinion in the Mishna in Taharot (2:2) that a shelishi that was treated as teruma is considered a sheni for kodashim . The difficulty is resolved by distinguishing between items treated as teruma and those treated as kodashim . The reason to distinguish is that those who are careful from impurities for teruma are not cautious enough regarding kodashim . This distinction is proven from a Mishna in Chagiga (18b). Rava, however, disagrees with the application of the Mishna in Chagiga to this case, and disagrees with Rav Yitzchak. A difficulty is raised against this distinction from a Mishna in Chagiga (24b) where one designated part of the wine in a barrel of teruma to be kodashim . If the protection for teruma is not valid for kodashim , wouldn't the teruma wine make the kodashim wine impure? To resolve this they distinguish between teruma and kodashim that are combined and those that are not combined. A second difficulty on Rav Yitzchak is brought from a braita that clearly states that a shelishi of items that are treated…