Episode

Chullin 26 - May 26, 10 Sivan

Podcast
Daf Yomi for Women - Hadran
Published
May 26, 2026
Duration seconds
2793
Processing state
not_requested
Canonical source
https://hadran.org.il/daf/chullin-26/
Audio
https://traffic.libsyn.com/secure/hadran/Chullin26.mp3?dest-id=1768700
JSON
/v1/public/podcasts/daf-yomi-for-women-hadran-638456/episodes/chullin-26-may-26-10-sivan
Markdown
/podcast/daf-yomi-for-women-hadran-638456/chullin-26-may-26-10-sivan.md

Actions

  • POST https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/daf-yomi-for-women-hadran-638456/episodes/chullin-26-may-26-10-sivan/transcription-requests
    Idempotently request low-priority transcript generation for this episode.
  • GET https://stenobird.com/podcast/daf-yomi-for-women-hadran-638456/chullin-26-may-26-10-sivan.md
    Read the agent-friendly Markdown representation of this episode resource.

Summary

Study Guide The Gemara clarifies which Tanna the Mishna follows regarding temed (grape-seed water). Rav Nachman in the name of Rabba bar Avahu explains that the dispute in the Mishna in Ma'asrot between Rabbi Yehuda and the Sages applies after it ferments, so our Mishna can align with the view of Rabbi Yehuda. Rav Nachman said in the name of Rabba bar Avahu that if a person bought temed with s econd t ithe funds before it fermented, and it ultimately fermented, it is treated as wine. His words pose a difficulty for our Mishna, which did not present such an option. Rabba establishes the Mishna in a case where it is clear that it will not ferment later, while Rava suggests that the Mishna follows the view of Rabbi Yochanan ben Nuri, who holds that everything follows the visual appearance ( chazuta ) at the time of the sale. Rabbi Elazar disputes Rav Nachman's understanding of the Mishna in Ma'asrot, holding that the dispute applies when it has not fermented, but once it ferments, everyone agrees it is considered wine. A braita brings the laws of purifying temed that has not yet fermented by connecting it to water ( haska ). Rava limits this rule, explaining that this applies only when the water of the temed was pure from the beginning and became impure after it became temed , but if it was impure from the outset, it does not. However, Rav Ashi rejects his ruling and argues that there is no logic to distinguish between the cases. The Mishna states that anywhere there is a sale (a minor girl, ketana ), there is no fine for rape (whose law only applies to a young woman, na'ara ), and anywhere there is a fine, there is no sale. Rav Yehuda in the name of Rav explains that this is the view of Rabbi Meir, but the Sages say that a fine applies even to a ketana . A Mishna states…