Episode
Chullin 2 - Shabbat May 2, 15 Iyar
- Podcast
- Daf Yomi for Women - Hadran
- Published
- May 1, 2026
- Duration seconds
- 2323
- Processing state
not_requested- Canonical source
- https://hadran.org.il/daf/chullin-2/
Actions
POST https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/daf-yomi-for-women-hadran-638456/episodes/chullin-2-shabbat-may-2-15-iyar/transcription-requests
Idempotently request low-priority transcript generation for this episode.GET https://stenobird.com/podcast/daf-yomi-for-women-hadran-638456/chullin-2-shabbat-may-2-15-iyar.md
Read the agent-friendly Markdown representation of this episode resource.
Summary
Study Guide The Mishna rules that all are permitted to slaughter animals, and if they do, the meat is kosher. While establishing this broad permission, the Mishna excludes minors, deaf-mutes ( cheresh ), and the mentally incompetent ( shoteh ). However, if a n adult supervises them to ensure the slaughter was performed correctly, the meat is valid. The Gemara questions the Mishna's phrasing: the opening phrase "all may slaughter" implies an ab initio ( l'chatchila ) permission, yet the concluding phrase "their slaughtering is kosher" suggests the act is only valid post facto ( b'dieved ). Initially, Rav Acha attempts to prove from other Mishnayot that the term "all" can indeed refer to a post facto case, neutralizing the question. Conversely, Rav Ashi cites other Mishnayot to show that "all" is a term typically used for ab initio rulings. While both ultimately concede that "all" can technically carry both meanings, Rav Ashi argues that the context here implies ab initio. To resolve the Gemara's original difficulty, Rava bar Ulla explains that each phrase in the Mishna refers to a different specific case, and he proceeds to re-interpret each line accordingly. However, three difficulties are subsequently raised against Rava bar Ulla's interpretation, all of which the Gemara eventually resolves.