Episode
Chullin 13 - May 13, 26 Iyar
- Podcast
- Daf Yomi for Women - Hadran
- Published
- May 13, 2026
- Duration seconds
- 2776
- Processing state
not_requested- Canonical source
- https://hadran.org.il/daf/chullin-13/
Actions
POST https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/daf-yomi-for-women-hadran-638456/episodes/chullin-13-may-13-26-iyar/transcription-requests
Idempotently request low-priority transcript generation for this episode.GET https://stenobird.com/podcast/daf-yomi-for-women-hadran-638456/chullin-13-may-13-26-iyar.md
Read the agent-friendly Markdown representation of this episode resource.
Summary
Rabbi Chiya bar Abba recounts a discussion between Rabbi Ami and Rabbi Yochanan regarding the legal weight of a minor's intent. In the first version, the question is whether a minor's thoughts alone are significant. Rabbi Ami argues it is obvious they are not, citing a Mishna in Kelim 17:15 . Rabbi Yochanan clarifies that the doubt applies when a minor's action reasonably demonstrates their intent , but not completely - such as moving an animal to the northern part of the Temple courtyard, the specific area for slaughtering burnt offerings. Rabbi Ami challenges this, noting that Rabbi Yochanan himself previously ruled in the context of ritual impurity t hat a minor's action i s significant when the minor's intent is reasonably clear from the action . Rabbi Yochanan responds that his question was whether such actions are valid by Torah law or only by Rabbinic decree; the matter remains unresolved. Rav Nachman bar Yitzchak offers a different version of the discussion, focusing on whether a minor's actions are effective. This version concludes with Rabbi Yochanan distinguishing between three categories: actions with clear intent, actions with reasonably clear, but not completely clear intent, and intent without any accompanying action. Shmuel asks Rav Huna for the biblical source disqualifying sacrifices that were slaughtered without the specific intent to perform a slaughter ( mitasek ). The Mishna rules that meat slaughtered by a non-Jew is considered neveila (a carcass) and imparts impurity by carrying ( masa ). Rabbi Yochanan and Rabbi Ami draw different inferences from this. Rabbi Yochanan suggests the Mishna follows the Sages (against Rabbi Eliezer) in assuming that gentiles do not automatically slaughter for idolatrous purposes; if they did, the meat would be forbi…