Episode

SH290: What Happens Underwater, Stays Underwater — And That's a Problem. Part 1 of 3

Podcast
Counter-Errorism in Diving: Applying Human Factors to Diving
Published
Jun 24, 2026
Duration seconds
754
Processing state
not_requested
Canonical source
https://www.thehumandiver.com/
Audio
https://episodes.captivate.fm/episode/0ea0fd56-6409-4a5b-905e-dd92e6b6a6ee.mp3
JSON
/v1/public/podcasts/counter-errorism-in-diving-applying-human-factors-to-diving-6626048/episodes/sh290-what-happens-underwater-stays-underwater-and-that-s-a-problem-part-1-of-3
Markdown
/podcast/counter-errorism-in-diving-applying-human-factors-to-diving-6626048/sh290-what-happens-underwater-stays-underwater-and-that-s-a-problem-part-1-of-3.md

Actions

  • POST https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/counter-errorism-in-diving-applying-human-factors-to-diving-6626048/episodes/sh290-what-happens-underwater-stays-underwater-and-that-s-a-problem-part-1-of-3/transcription-requests
    Idempotently request low-priority transcript generation for this episode.
  • GET https://stenobird.com/podcast/counter-errorism-in-diving-applying-human-factors-to-diving-6626048/sh290-what-happens-underwater-stays-underwater-and-that-s-a-problem-part-1-of-3.md
    Read the agent-friendly Markdown representation of this episode resource.

Summary

This episode introduces the problem behind learning in diving safety, using the 2020 death of Linnea Mills to highlight how incidents are often caused by deeper system issues, not just individual mistakes. While near-misses and accidents happen regularly in diving, most are never shared or analysed, meaning valuable lessons are lost. Unlike industries such as aviation or healthcare, diving lacks strong reporting systems, regulation, and reliable data, so decisions are often based on uncertainty rather than evidence. Existing reports tend to focus on immediate causes like equipment failure or diver error, but miss the wider social, organisational, and environmental factors that shape outcomes. The episode argues that meaningful learning comes from “context-rich” stories that explain not just what happened, but why it made sense at the time. Drawing on safety research from other industries, it highlights the need for a stronger reporting culture, psychological safety, and system-level thinking to improve learning and prevent future incidents. Original blog: https://www.thehumandiver.com/post/msc-part-1-the-problem-space References: Dekker, S. (2017). Just culture: Restoring trust and accountability in your organization (3rd ed.). CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group. Drupsteen, L., & Guldenmund, F. (2014). What is learning: A review of the safety literature to define learning from incidents, accidents and disasters. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 22 (2), 81–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5973.12039 EC. (2014). Regulation (EU) No 376/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 April 2014 . European Commission. Gigerenzer, G. (2014). Risk savvy . Viking. https://www.amazon.co.uk/Risk-Savvy-Make-Good-Decisions/dp/1846144744 Lock, G. (2011…