Episode

SoS 2026: Immigration, Refuge, and Corporate Liability

Podcast
Civil Discourse
Published
Jul 3, 2026
Duration seconds
3748
Processing state
not_requested
Canonical source
https://share.transistor.fm/s/4076a068
Audio
https://media.transistor.fm/4076a068/35d94de1.mp3
JSON
/v1/public/podcasts/civil-discourse-765918/episodes/sos-2026-immigration-refuge-and-corporate-liability
Markdown
/podcast/civil-discourse-765918/sos-2026-immigration-refuge-and-corporate-liability.md

Actions

  • POST https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/civil-discourse-765918/episodes/sos-2026-immigration-refuge-and-corporate-liability/transcription-requests
    Idempotently request low-priority transcript generation for this episode.
  • GET https://stenobird.com/podcast/civil-discourse-765918/sos-2026-immigration-refuge-and-corporate-liability.md
    Read the agent-friendly Markdown representation of this episode resource.

Summary

Aughie and Nia discuss the opinions in Noes v Al Otro Lado, Mullin v Doe, and Cisco Systems v Doe. The first case allows the federal government to stop immigrants before arriving on American soil to ask for asylum. The second case allows the government to cancel Temporary Protection Status visas. The third case does not allow Cisco to be sued because the Chinese government used its software to locate and torture Chinese dissidents.