Episode

Why College Presidents Need a Coalition for Civic Preparedness

Podcast
Changing Higher Ed
Published
May 5, 2026
Duration seconds
2252
Processing state
not_requested
Canonical source
https://changinghighered.libsyn.com/draft-p310-rajiv-vinnakota-draft
Audio
https://traffic.libsyn.com/secure/changinghighered/CHE_310_-_Rajiv_Vinnakota_FINAL.mp3?dest-id=751925
JSON
/v1/public/podcasts/changing-higher-ed-205463/episodes/why-college-presidents-need-a-coalition-for-civic-preparedness
Markdown
/podcast/changing-higher-ed-205463/why-college-presidents-need-a-coalition-for-civic-preparedness.md

Actions

  • POST https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/changing-higher-ed-205463/episodes/why-college-presidents-need-a-coalition-for-civic-preparedness/transcription-requests
    Idempotently request low-priority transcript generation for this episode.
  • GET https://stenobird.com/podcast/changing-higher-ed-205463/why-college-presidents-need-a-coalition-for-civic-preparedness.md
    Read the agent-friendly Markdown representation of this episode resource.

Summary

Civic preparedness in higher education can no longer be treated as an assumed byproduct of a college education. In this episode of the Changing Higher Ed® podcast , Dr. Drumm McNaughton speaks with Raj Vinnakota , president of the Institute for Citizens & Scholars , about how colleges and universities can rebuild the civic skills students need to navigate disagreement, evaluate credible information, and solve problems across difference. Drawing on his work with college presidents, faculty, employers, and Gen Z leaders, Vinnakota explains why higher education has drifted too far toward a private-good narrative focused almost entirely on jobs and individual outcomes. He makes the case that institutions must also reclaim their public-good responsibility by preparing students to participate productively in civic life. The conversation also explores College Presidents for Civic Preparedness, or CP², a coalition of 135 college and university presidents working together to lower the political and institutional risk of leading civic preparedness work alone. Vinnakota explains why opt-in programming is not enough, why faculty need support to teach contentious issues, and why shared measurement is needed to move civic preparedness from rhetoric to campus-wide culture change. This conversation is especially relevant for presidents, boards, provosts, faculty leaders, and institutional teams working to strengthen civic learning, rebuild public trust, and prepare graduates for a more polarized and information-saturated world. Topics Covered: Why civic preparedness can no longer be assumed as a byproduct of college How higher education's public-good mission has been crowded out by short-term job-focused framing Why presidents who lead civic preparedness alone often face stakeholder p…