Episode
The Future of the European Union: Socio-Economic and Political Challenges to its Legal-Constitutional Framework: CELS Seminar
- Published
- Mar 13, 2025
- Duration seconds
- 2183
- Processing state
not_requested
Actions
POST https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/cambridge-centre-for-european-legal-studies-cels-podcast-7108287/episodes/the-future-of-the-european-union-socio-economic-and-political-challenges-to-its-legal-constitutional-framework-cels-seminar/transcription-requests
Idempotently request low-priority transcript generation for this episode.GET https://stenobird.com/podcast/cambridge-centre-for-european-legal-studies-cels-podcast-7108287/the-future-of-the-european-union-socio-economic-and-political-challenges-to-its-legal-constitutional-framework-cels-seminar.md
Read the agent-friendly Markdown representation of this episode resource.
Summary
Speaker: Dr Bernadette Zelger, University of Innsbruck Abstract: The debate about the future of the European Union has long left academic circles, arrived in the midst of society and been awarded political attention. Meanwhile, there has been an increase of Euroscepticism accompanied by more nationalist political developments echoed in the swings to the right all across the EU. These developments may, arguably at least in parts, be explained by social resentments of the peoples of Europe. While acknowledging that law constructs and contributes to a social reality of its own it is thus, arguably also about the lack of a genuine socio-economic equilibrium within the law and political system of the EU. This imbalance is not only found within the EU legal constitutional framework, but also within the case-law of the European Court of Justice. However, possible solutions to solve this socio-economic imbalance are limited: It is either (i) Treaty reform or, alternatively, (ii) a change in the approach of the Court in its jurisprudence. While these alternatives are both valid and, to some extent, mutually exclusive, they unveil and epitomise different visions as regards the future of the European Union. However, while acknowledging the differences in the approach, they are arguably different means to serve the very same end: Warrant the European Union’s future success. For more information see: https://www.cels.law.cam.ac.uk/weekly-seminar-series