Episode
The 'For Women Scotland' judgment - An academic discussion: CELS Webinar
- Published
- May 21, 2025
- Duration seconds
- 3602
- Processing state
not_requested
Actions
POST https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/cambridge-centre-for-european-legal-studies-cels-podcast-7108287/episodes/the-for-women-scotland-judgment-an-academic-discussion-cels-webinar/transcription-requests
Idempotently request low-priority transcript generation for this episode.GET https://stenobird.com/podcast/cambridge-centre-for-european-legal-studies-cels-podcast-7108287/the-for-women-scotland-judgment-an-academic-discussion-cels-webinar.md
Read the agent-friendly Markdown representation of this episode resource.
Summary
An online debate considering the recent Supreme Court case of 'For Women Scotland Ltd v The Scottish Ministers' which was handed down on 16 April featuring Aidan O’Neill KC (Scot.), KC (E&W), BL (Ireland) who appeared for For Women Scotland. In the discussion Aidan reflected on his experiences of the case, the judgment and participate in a debate of the issues it raises going forward. This was followed by a response from Dr Lena Holzer, and then a question and answer session. For more information see: https://www.cels.law.cam.ac.uk/activities-archive