Episode
'The CJEU, its legal reasoning, and its interaction with its Advocates-General': CELS Seminar
- Published
- Nov 29, 2023
- Duration seconds
- 2528
- Processing state
not_requested
Actions
POST https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/cambridge-centre-for-european-legal-studies-cels-podcast-7108287/episodes/the-cjeu-its-legal-reasoning-and-its-interaction-with-its-advocates-general-cels-seminar/transcription-requests
Idempotently request low-priority transcript generation for this episode.GET https://stenobird.com/podcast/cambridge-centre-for-european-legal-studies-cels-podcast-7108287/the-cjeu-its-legal-reasoning-and-its-interaction-with-its-advocates-general-cels-seminar.md
Read the agent-friendly Markdown representation of this episode resource.
Summary
Speaker: Eleanor Sharpston KC, Advocate General, CJEU (2006-2020) and Goodhart Professor, University of Cambridge (2023/2024) Abstract: The CJEU is a court that speaks through a single judgment, and that ‘dialogues’ with its Advocates General without ever saying quite what that dialogue means. What is the reader to make of the interplay between the individual opinion of the advocate general and the collective decision of the judges? The final seminar in the series asks some questions, suggests some partial answers, and invites reflection on whether the current arrangements should ‘evolve’ (and, if so, in what direction). This entry provides an audio-only item for iTunes. For more information see: https://www.cels.law.cam.ac.uk/weekly-seminar-series