Episode
'Decoding CJEU Judgments': CELS Seminar
- Published
- Nov 8, 2023
- Duration seconds
- 2771
- Processing state
not_requested
Actions
POST https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/cambridge-centre-for-european-legal-studies-cels-podcast-7108287/episodes/decoding-cjeu-judgments-cels-seminar/transcription-requests
Idempotently request low-priority transcript generation for this episode.GET https://stenobird.com/podcast/cambridge-centre-for-european-legal-studies-cels-podcast-7108287/decoding-cjeu-judgments-cels-seminar.md
Read the agent-friendly Markdown representation of this episode resource.
Summary
Speaker: Eleanor Sharpston KC, Advocate General, CJEU (2006-2020) and Goodhart Professor, University of Cambridge (2023/2024) Abstract: A common complaint of common lawyers is that the way in which CJEU judgments are written is abstract and obscure. The criticism is levelled most notably at judgments that reply to requests for a preliminary ruling from national courts. Once you understand about language and the Court, there are a lot of hidden clues, if you only know where to look for them. This second seminar is designed to help you squeeze the maximum information out of the text, and alert you to what those formulae you’re reading really mean. This entry provides an audio-only item for iTunes. For more information see: https://www.cels.law.cam.ac.uk/weekly-seminar-series