Episode
Episode 583 - Debate: Should Democrats Campaign on Climate Change Anymore? (W/ Matt Huber & Aaron Regunberg)
- Podcast
- Bad Faith
- Published
- Jun 11, 2026
- Duration seconds
- 5784
- Processing state
not_requested
Actions
POST https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/bad-faith-1365797/episodes/episode-583-debate-should-democrats-campaign-on-climate-change-anymore-w-matt-huber-aaron-regunberg/transcription-requests
Idempotently request low-priority transcript generation for this episode.GET https://stenobird.com/podcast/bad-faith-1365797/episode-583-debate-should-democrats-campaign-on-climate-change-anymore-w-matt-huber-aaron-regunberg.md
Read the agent-friendly Markdown representation of this episode resource.
Summary
A few weeks ago, we had an all star panel to discuss AI data centers and the pivot in both liberal and left publications away from embracing climate change as an issue. One of those articles was written in the New York Times by Syracuse professor Matt Huber, who teachers in the geography and environment department. Today, Huber joins the podcast with AI panelist Aaron Reguberg to push back on how his argument was characterized, and to defend his take that Democrats don't have to campaign on climate change anymore because they can win by prioritizing economic issues. Are these ideas in tension? Does opposing AI data centers constitute both a material and environmental issue? Did Green New Deal advocacy hurt Democrats? Was it unpopular, or was it thwarted by the Democratic establishment before it had a chance to be explained? Is the takeaway from Mamdani's success in New York City that Democrats should decenter climate? Why is Briahna defending AOC?