Episode

Your Attempt To Solve Debate Will Not Work

Podcast
Astral Codex Ten Podcast
Published
May 20, 2026
Duration seconds
525
Processing state
not_requested
Canonical source
https://sscpodcast.libsyn.com/your-attempt-to-solve-debate-will-not-work
Audio
https://traffic.libsyn.com/secure/sscpodcast/Your_Attempt_To_Solve_Debate_Will_Not_Work_1.mp3?dest-id=586545
JSON
/v1/public/podcasts/astral-codex-ten-podcast-226483/episodes/your-attempt-to-solve-debate-will-not-work
Markdown
/podcast/astral-codex-ten-podcast-226483/your-attempt-to-solve-debate-will-not-work.md

Actions

  • POST https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/astral-codex-ten-podcast-226483/episodes/your-attempt-to-solve-debate-will-not-work/transcription-requests
    Idempotently request low-priority transcript generation for this episode.
  • GET https://stenobird.com/podcast/astral-codex-ten-podcast-226483/your-attempt-to-solve-debate-will-not-work.md
    Read the agent-friendly Markdown representation of this episode resource.

Summary

As a blogger, I hear about lots of projects to "solve debate", or "disagree better", or "map arguments". Often these are ACX grant applications. I always turn them down. They're well-intentioned, sophisticated, and doomed. I appreciate that Internet arguments usually don't go well, that there are lots of ways to improve them, and that this is a worthy cause. But I've also seen a dozen projects of this sort fail. Here's why I think yours will too: "Debate" almost never corresponds to mappable arguments. The simplest "solve debate" proposal is the argument map. Some technology helps people decompose arguments into premises and conclusions, then lets skeptics point out where the premises are wrong, or where the conclusion doesn't follow from the premise. But almost no real argument works that way. https://www.astralcodexten.com/p/your-attempt-to-solve-debate-will