Episode

The Alternatives to Animal Research

Podcast
Animal Rights: the Debate
Published
Jun 5, 2025
Duration seconds
2073
Processing state
not_requested
Canonical source
https://8455740d-a913-453b-a5ed-20f522efd647.libsyn.com/the-alternatives-to-animal-research
Audio
https://traffic.libsyn.com/secure/8455740d-a913-453b-a5ed-20f522efd647/riverside_david_pandora_rachel_2nd_podcast.mp3?dest-id=4223538
JSON
/v1/public/podcasts/animal-rights-the-debate-6705712/episodes/the-alternatives-to-animal-research
Markdown
/podcast/animal-rights-the-debate-6705712/the-alternatives-to-animal-research.md

Actions

  • POST https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/animal-rights-the-debate-6705712/episodes/the-alternatives-to-animal-research/transcription-requests
    Idempotently request low-priority transcript generation for this episode.
  • GET https://stenobird.com/podcast/animal-rights-the-debate-6705712/the-alternatives-to-animal-research.md
    Read the agent-friendly Markdown representation of this episode resource.

Summary

In the second of our two-part discussion about experiments on animals, we talk to Pandora Pound and Rachel Smith about the reliability or otherwise of scientific research using animals, much of which causes profound suffering. They discuss examples of where animal experiments have failed to predict serious adverse effects in people and the huge potential of various non-animal approaches. They also focus on the ethical imperative of using methods which give the best chance of cures for serious illnesses, subject to the overall proviso that unethical methods (such as experimenting non-consensually on people) should not be used. Donate here: https://ko-fi.com/animalrightsdebate Join the WhatsApp community: https://chat.whatsapp.com/LTGteTLZkwI9XUtB1Xxfen Find out more: https://linktr.ee/animalrightsdebate