Episode
Substantive Expansion - with Advisory Opinions and Divided Argument
- Podcast
- Amarica's Constitution
- Published
- Mar 11, 2026
- Duration seconds
- 4839
- Processing state
not_requested
Actions
POST https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/amarica-s-constitution-3511925/episodes/substantive-expansion-with-advisory-opinions-and-divided-argument/transcription-requests
Idempotently request low-priority transcript generation for this episode.GET https://stenobird.com/podcast/amarica-s-constitution-3511925/substantive-expansion-with-advisory-opinions-and-divided-argument.md
Read the agent-friendly Markdown representation of this episode resource.
Summary
Amarica’s Constitution has joined with two other great podcasts! We’re still ourselves, but today we bring all three podcasts together to look at a recent case, Mirabelli v. Bonta, which brings substantive due process back to center stage. And because we are who we are, we take a look ourselves at some more aspects of - what else? - the birthright citizenship case. Learn what the future holds for our listeners, as we bring you what we always have, and more. Attorneys and judges can gain CLE credit from podcast.njsba.com.