Episode

Dissenting from the Dissents

Podcast
Amarica's Constitution
Published
Jul 16, 2026
Duration seconds
5205
Processing state
not_requested
Canonical source
https://amaricasconstitution.podbean.com/e/dissenting-from-the-dissents/
Audio
https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/kt7izqjishdgcdrs/287_Dissenting_From_the_Dissents.mp3
JSON
/v1/public/podcasts/amarica-s-constitution-3511925/episodes/dissenting-from-the-dissents
Markdown
/podcast/amarica-s-constitution-3511925/dissenting-from-the-dissents.md

Actions

  • POST https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/amarica-s-constitution-3511925/episodes/dissenting-from-the-dissents/transcription-requests
    Idempotently request low-priority transcript generation for this episode.
  • GET https://stenobird.com/podcast/amarica-s-constitution-3511925/dissenting-from-the-dissents.md
    Read the agent-friendly Markdown representation of this episode resource.

Summary

How could the vote in Trump v. Barbara have been as close as it was? Many have been bewildered by the vote in this case, given the strength of the arguments in Chief Justice Roberts' majority opinion, the long history of birthright citizenship, the statutory history, and the clear text of the 14th amendment. We try to understand this by looking at how the dissents took an aberrant and incorrect approach to the very act of dissenting. To do this, we have to look at a general theory of dissents at the Supreme Court - and so we do. Meanwhile, a foreign nation's holiday is celebrated, as well it should be given this nation's role in our own achievement of independence. Lawyers And Judges Are Eligible For Continuing Legal Education Credit by visiting podcast.njsba.com.