Episode
Why More Nonprofits Are Ditching the Traditional Feasibility Study
- Published
- Apr 21, 2026
- Duration seconds
- 1858
- Processing state
not_requested
Actions
POST https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/all-about-capital-campaigns-nonprofits-fundraising-major-gifts-toolkit-2136244/episodes/why-more-nonprofits-are-ditching-the-traditional-feasibility-study/transcription-requests
Idempotently request low-priority transcript generation for this episode.GET https://stenobird.com/podcast/all-about-capital-campaigns-nonprofits-fundraising-major-gifts-toolkit-2136244/why-more-nonprofits-are-ditching-the-traditional-feasibility-study.md
Read the agent-friendly Markdown representation of this episode resource.
Summary
Before launching a capital campaign, most nonprofits hire a consultant to conduct a feasibility study. The consultant interviews donors, disappears for a few weeks, and returns with a report and a number. It’s the way it’s been done for decades. But a growing number of organizations are choosing a different path—and getting dramatically better results. In this episode of All About Capital Campaigns , Andrea Kihlstedt sat down with Emily Cozart Mohammed, Vice President of Development at the Center for Investigative Reporting, to discuss her experience completing a Guided Feasibility Study for a $50 million campaign. The conversation made a compelling case for why the guided model is replacing the traditional approach. In a traditional feasibility study, an outside consultant conducts every donor interview, compiles the data, and delivers a final report. The organization gets a number and some general feedback, but the staff never hears directly from donors and often has no idea who said what. Emily put it bluntly: not having that intel within your own system feels backwards. The Guided Feasibility Study flips this model. Instead of outsourcing donor conversations, the organization’s own leaders—the VP of development, the CEO, trained board members—conduct the interviews themselves, with structured coaching and support from a Capital Campaign Pro advisor. The result is threefold: better data, deeper donor relationships, and a team that’s ready to fundraise. Emily’s team completed 55 interviews with a 2% decline rate—a remarkable response that reflects both donor engagement and organizational credibility. Donors told her repeatedly how much they preferred speaking directly with organizational leaders rather than, as one donor put it, another guy in a suit pitching one org…