Episode
#507 Neil: GLM-5.2 Vs GPT-5.5 Vs Claude Opus 4.8 Coding Test
- Podcast
- AI Fire Daily
- Published
- Jun 23, 2026
- Duration seconds
- 1005
- Processing state
not_requested- Canonical source
- https://rss.com/podcasts/ai-fire-daily/2938513
Actions
POST https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/ai-fire-daily-7354020/episodes/507-neil-glm-5-2-vs-gpt-5-5-vs-claude-opus-4-8-coding-test/transcription-requests
Idempotently request low-priority transcript generation for this episode.GET https://stenobird.com/podcast/ai-fire-daily-7354020/507-neil-glm-5-2-vs-gpt-5-5-vs-claude-opus-4-8-coding-test.md
Read the agent-friendly Markdown representation of this episode resource.
Summary
GLM-5.2 looks close to GPT-5.5 and Claude Opus 4.8 on benchmarks, but real coding tests tell a messier story. Compare token costs, game builds, bug hunts, and which model fits your work best. ⚔️ We'll talk about : What DeepSWE and FrontierSWE actually measure Why cheap token pricing can still become expensive Why open-weight does not always mean easy to run locally How GPT-5.5, Claude Opus 4.8, and GLM-5.2 compare in real tests Which model fits game builds, bug hunting, and API use cases Keywords : GLM-5.2, GPT-5.5, Claude Opus 4.8, AI Coding Model Comparison, DeepSWE Benchmark, AI Tools. Links: Newsletter: Sign up for our FREE daily newsletter. Our Community: Get 3-level AI tutorials across industries. Join AI Fire Academy: 500+ advanced AI workflows ($14,500+ Value) Our Socials: Facebook Group: Join 294K+ AI builders X (Twitter): Follow us for daily AI drops YouTube: Watch AI walkthroughs & tutorials