Episode

The Three Whisky Happy Hour: From Birthright Religion to "Lockistotle"

Podcast
3 Whisky Happy Hour
Published
Apr 3, 2026
Duration seconds
3726
Processing state
processed
Canonical source
https://www.spreaker.com/episode/the-three-whisky-happy-hour-from-birthright-religion-to-lockistotle--71082846
Audio
https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/media.blubrry.com/3809862/api.spreaker.com/download/episode/71082846/3whh_4_3_26_4_2_26_6_50_pm.mp3
JSON
/v1/public/podcasts/3-whisky-happy-hour-589836/episodes/the-three-whisky-happy-hour-from-birthright-religion-to-lockistotle
Markdown
/podcast/3-whisky-happy-hour-589836/the-three-whisky-happy-hour-from-birthright-religion-to-lockistotle.md

Actions

  • POST https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/3-whisky-happy-hour-589836/episodes/the-three-whisky-happy-hour-from-birthright-religion-to-lockistotle/transcription-requests
    Idempotently request low-priority transcript generation for this episode.
  • GET https://stenobird.com/podcast/3-whisky-happy-hour-589836/the-three-whisky-happy-hour-from-birthright-religion-to-lockistotle.md
    Read the agent-friendly Markdown representation of this episode resource.

Summary

Notre Dame's Tocqueville professor of political science, Vincent Phillip Munoz (Phil to his freinds and colleagues), joins this special episode which finds all three of your regular bartenders in the same room for once while on the road in Austin, Texas. Phil is one of the leading scholars of religious liberty in the U.S., and after a progress report on the Iran War (we're still winning), and a prolonged look at the Supreme Court oral arguments in Trump v. Barbara , the birthright citizenship case heard this week, we pick Phil's brain about the status of school prayer, and whether a restoration of organized prayer in public schools has a prayer of happening, taking as our cue Gerry Bradley's recent and provocative First Things article, " How To Bring Back School Prayer ." From there we briefly (but alas because we were out of sufficient time) but inadequately treat Phil's terrifically concise CRB essay " Ancient and Modern: How Straussians Interpret the Founding ," mostly to annoy John Yoo—and we succeeded!