{"podcast":{"title":"Swear on the Stand","slug":"swear-on-the-stand-7111404","podcast_index_feed_id":7111404,"rss_url":"https://anchor.fm/s/fddb5314/podcast/rss","website_url":"https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/danielswear","image_url":"https://d3t3ozftmdmh3i.cloudfront.net/staging/podcast_uploaded_nologo/42490093/42490093-1732466737482-64af1021e8b8d.jpg","author":"Daniel W. Swear","episode_count":193,"summary":"Court decisions are complex and difficult to digest. This podcast is designed to educating listeners on current legal decisions in a fun and interesting way. Researched by me and produced with the assistance of AI.","last_synced_at":"2026-07-10T22:18:10.447360+00:00","page_url":"https://stenobird.com/podcast/swear-on-the-stand-7111404"},"episode":{"title":"United States v. Baldemoro: Limits of Postrevocation Imprisonment","slug":"united-states-v-baldemoro-limits-of-postrevocation-imprisonment","published_at":"2026-07-02T12:00:00+00:00","page_url":"https://stenobird.com/podcast/swear-on-the-stand-7111404/united-states-v-baldemoro-limits-of-postrevocation-imprisonment","show_page_url":"https://stenobird.com/podcast/swear-on-the-stand-7111404","url":"https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/danielswear/episodes/United-States-v--Baldemoro-Limits-of-Postrevocation-Imprisonment-e3ktoju","audio_url":"https://anchor.fm/s/fddb5314/podcast/play/121610302/https%3A%2F%2Fd3ctxlq1ktw2nl.cloudfront.net%2Fstaging%2F2026-5-17%2Fef88d8d3-d38d-c43f-049f-27325820d206.m4a","summary":"This episode is a formal opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit regarding the consolidated appeals of James Baldemoro. After serving a ten-year maximum sentence for child pornography, Baldemoro challenged two subsequent revocations of his supervised release that resulted in additional prison time. He argued that these further periods of incarceration were unconstitutional and exceeded statutory limits because he had already completed the maximum term for his original crime. The court rejected his arguments , clarifying that federal law allows for reimprisonment upon violation of supervision terms regardless of the underlying offense's maximum sentence. Ultimately, the appellate court affirmed the district court's judgments , ruling that the specialized protections of a criminal trial do not apply to the revocation process .","meta_description":"This episode is a formal opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit regarding the consolidated appeals of James Baldemoro. Afte…","key_points":[],"chapters":[],"topics":[],"duration_seconds":2017,"processing_state":"not_requested","actions":[{"name":"request_transcript","method":"POST","url":"https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/swear-on-the-stand-7111404/episodes/united-states-v-baldemoro-limits-of-postrevocation-imprisonment/transcription-requests","description":"Idempotently request low-priority transcript generation for this episode."},{"name":"read_markdown","method":"GET","url":"https://stenobird.com/podcast/swear-on-the-stand-7111404/united-states-v-baldemoro-limits-of-postrevocation-imprisonment.md","description":"Read the agent-friendly Markdown representation of this episode resource."}]}}