{"podcast":{"title":"Swear on the Stand","slug":"swear-on-the-stand-7111404","podcast_index_feed_id":7111404,"rss_url":"https://anchor.fm/s/fddb5314/podcast/rss","website_url":"https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/danielswear","image_url":"https://d3t3ozftmdmh3i.cloudfront.net/staging/podcast_uploaded_nologo/42490093/42490093-1732466737482-64af1021e8b8d.jpg","author":"Daniel W. Swear","episode_count":193,"summary":"Court decisions are complex and difficult to digest. This podcast is designed to educating listeners on current legal decisions in a fun and interesting way. Researched by me and produced with the assistance of AI.","last_synced_at":"2026-07-10T22:18:10.447360+00:00","page_url":"https://stenobird.com/podcast/swear-on-the-stand-7111404"},"episode":{"title":"The Privacy of Physical Movement: Chatrie v. United States","slug":"the-privacy-of-physical-movement-chatrie-v-united-states","published_at":"2026-06-29T17:45:20+00:00","page_url":"https://stenobird.com/podcast/swear-on-the-stand-7111404/the-privacy-of-physical-movement-chatrie-v-united-states","show_page_url":"https://stenobird.com/podcast/swear-on-the-stand-7111404","url":"https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/danielswear/episodes/The-Privacy-of-Physical-Movement-Chatrie-v--United-States-e3ledju","audio_url":"https://anchor.fm/s/fddb5314/podcast/play/122156094/https%3A%2F%2Fd3ctxlq1ktw2nl.cloudfront.net%2Fstaging%2F2026-5-29%2Fee0426dc-7311-fd18-965b-df057ffa3bba.m4a","summary":"This episode presents the United States Supreme Court’s 2026 decision in Chatrie v. United States , a landmark case concerning the constitutionality of geofence warrants . The Court ruled that law enforcement conducts a Fourth Amendment search when it acquires a person's Location History data from private companies like Google, as individuals maintain a reasonable expectation of privacy regarding their physical movements. Justice Kagan's majority opinion argues that this digital tracking provides an intimate window into a person’s life , comparable to the cell-site data protected in the earlier Carpenter ruling. While the Court established that such data collection requires constitutional oversight, it remanded the case to determine if the specific multi-step warrant used to identify Chatrie for a bank robbery was sufficiently particular and supported by probable cause . Separate opinions reflect deep judicial divisions, with some justices advocating for a property-based approach to digital effects, while dissenters criticized the ruling as an advisory opinion regarding an obsolete technology.","meta_description":"This episode presents the United States Supreme Court’s 2026 decision in Chatrie v. United States , a landmark case concerning the constitutionality of ge…","key_points":[],"chapters":[],"topics":[],"duration_seconds":1558,"processing_state":"not_requested","actions":[{"name":"request_transcript","method":"POST","url":"https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/swear-on-the-stand-7111404/episodes/the-privacy-of-physical-movement-chatrie-v-united-states/transcription-requests","description":"Idempotently request low-priority transcript generation for this episode."},{"name":"read_markdown","method":"GET","url":"https://stenobird.com/podcast/swear-on-the-stand-7111404/the-privacy-of-physical-movement-chatrie-v-united-states.md","description":"Read the agent-friendly Markdown representation of this episode resource."}]}}