{"podcast":{"title":"Swear on the Stand","slug":"swear-on-the-stand-7111404","podcast_index_feed_id":7111404,"rss_url":"https://anchor.fm/s/fddb5314/podcast/rss","website_url":"https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/danielswear","image_url":"https://d3t3ozftmdmh3i.cloudfront.net/staging/podcast_uploaded_nologo/42490093/42490093-1732466737482-64af1021e8b8d.jpg","author":"Daniel W. Swear","episode_count":193,"summary":"Court decisions are complex and difficult to digest. This podcast is designed to educating listeners on current legal decisions in a fun and interesting way. Researched by me and produced with the assistance of AI.","last_synced_at":"2026-07-10T22:18:10.447360+00:00","page_url":"https://stenobird.com/podcast/swear-on-the-stand-7111404"},"episode":{"title":"Martin v. Burgess: The Right to Access Bond Records","slug":"martin-v-burgess-the-right-to-access-bond-records","published_at":"2026-04-30T14:00:00+00:00","page_url":"https://stenobird.com/podcast/swear-on-the-stand-7111404/martin-v-burgess-the-right-to-access-bond-records","show_page_url":"https://stenobird.com/podcast/swear-on-the-stand-7111404","url":"https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/danielswear/episodes/Martin-v--Burgess-The-Right-to-Access-Bond-Records-e3ia5tl","audio_url":"https://anchor.fm/s/fddb5314/podcast/play/118871413/https%3A%2F%2Fd3ctxlq1ktw2nl.cloudfront.net%2Fstaging%2F2026-3-22%2Faf92ad05-d445-3ee8-907f-e069d811d4bb.m4a","summary":"This episode details a legal dispute involving Scott Martin , a marketer who sued Harris County officials after they restricted public access to criminal defendants' personal contact information in bail records. Martin argued that the administrative order hiding this data violated his First and Sixth Amendment rights by damaging his business of providing leads to defense attorneys. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit rejected these claims, determining that the government is not constitutionally required to provide access to such internal information. The court further clarified that the order was a valid exercise of administrative authority rather than an illegal restraint on speech. Ultimately, the judges affirmed the dismissal of the lawsuit, concluding that Martin possessed no protected property interest in the private data of defendants.","meta_description":"This episode details a legal dispute involving Scott Martin , a marketer who sued Harris County officials after they restricted public access to criminal…","key_points":[],"chapters":[],"topics":[],"duration_seconds":2634,"processing_state":"not_requested","actions":[{"name":"request_transcript","method":"POST","url":"https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/swear-on-the-stand-7111404/episodes/martin-v-burgess-the-right-to-access-bond-records/transcription-requests","description":"Idempotently request low-priority transcript generation for this episode."},{"name":"read_markdown","method":"GET","url":"https://stenobird.com/podcast/swear-on-the-stand-7111404/martin-v-burgess-the-right-to-access-bond-records.md","description":"Read the agent-friendly Markdown representation of this episode resource."}]}}