{"podcast":{"title":"Stanford Legal","slug":"stanford-legal-523119","podcast_index_feed_id":523119,"rss_url":"https://feeds.simplecast.com/_45D2qy7","website_url":"https://law.stanford.edu/stanford-legal-on-siriusxm/","image_url":"https://image.simplecastcdn.com/images/165ac7ef-05b7-4e09-951a-1fb92ece14f1/70262a7f-a6c5-4bba-9f2f-00f848d6b34c/3000x3000/stanford-legal-podcast-3.jpg?aid=rss_feed","author":"Stanford Law School","episode_count":206,"summary":"Law touches most aspects of life. Here to help make sense of it is the Stanford Legal podcast, where we look at the cases, questions, conflicts, and legal stories that affect us all every day. Pam Karlan studies and teaches a range of constitutional law-related courses with a special focus on what is known as the “law of democracy,”—the law that regulates voting, elections, and the political process. She served as a commissioner on the California Fair Political Practices Commission, an assistant counsel and cooperating attorney for the NAACP Legal Defense Fund, and (twice) as a Deputy Assistant Attorney General in the Civil Rights Division of the U.S. Department of Justice. She also co-directs the Stanford Supreme Court Litigation Clinic, which represents real clients before the highest court in the country, working on important cases including representing Edith Windsor in the landmark case striking down the federal Defense of Marriage Act and Donald Zarda in a case where the Supreme Court held that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 protects LGBT individuals against discrimination in employment. She has argued before the Court ten times. And Rich Ford’s teaching and writi…","last_synced_at":"2026-07-29T02:18:22.928229+00:00","page_url":"https://stenobird.com/podcast/stanford-legal-523119"},"episode":{"title":"The Declaration In the Age of General Purpose AI","slug":"the-declaration-in-the-age-of-general-purpose-ai","published_at":"2026-07-28T13:00:00+00:00","page_url":"https://stenobird.com/podcast/stanford-legal-523119/the-declaration-in-the-age-of-general-purpose-ai","show_page_url":"https://stenobird.com/podcast/stanford-legal-523119","url":"https://law.stanford.edu/stanford-legal-on-siriusxm/","audio_url":"https://op3.dev/e/https://tracking.swap.fm/track/zA4xtlPBvf2K1K9zesjz/afp-488641-injected.calisto.simplecastaudio.com/8180cc81-9ba2-4cda-b0b4-9ea3600a7b0e/episodes/ecd81d6f-fe60-4267-9688-7e02f35243cb/audio/128/default.mp3?aid=rss_feed&awCollectionId=8180cc81-9ba2-4cda-b0b4-9ea3600a7b0e&awEpisodeId=ecd81d6f-fe60-4267-9688-7e02f35243cb&feed=_45D2qy7","summary":"Alexander Tsesis argues the Declaration’s natural-rights logic limits First Amendment protection to conscious human beings, not AI systems. Anne Twitty adds historical nuance and asks whether abolitionists’ strong commitment to the public’s “right to hear” could inadvertently support a listener-centered case for protecting AI outputs. Tsesis replies that listener rights matter, but the First Amendment’s core remains human, speaker-centered expression.","meta_description":"Alexander Tsesis argues the Declaration’s natural-rights logic limits First Amendment protection to conscious human beings, not AI systems. Anne Twitty ad…","key_points":[],"chapters":[],"topics":[],"duration_seconds":4033,"processing_state":"not_requested","actions":[{"name":"request_transcript","method":"POST","url":"https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/stanford-legal-523119/episodes/the-declaration-in-the-age-of-general-purpose-ai/transcription-requests","description":"Idempotently request low-priority transcript generation for this episode."},{"name":"read_markdown","method":"GET","url":"https://stenobird.com/podcast/stanford-legal-523119/the-declaration-in-the-age-of-general-purpose-ai.md","description":"Read the agent-friendly Markdown representation of this episode resource."}]}}