{"podcast":{"title":"Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary","slug":"hidden-killers-with-tony-brueski-true-crime-news-commentary-5840426","podcast_index_feed_id":5840426,"rss_url":"https://audioboom.com/channels/5040505.rss","website_url":"https://audioboom.com/channels/5040505","image_url":"https://audioboom.com/i/43617911.jpg","author":"True Crime Today","episode_count":500,"summary":"🔎 Daily True Crime Podcast | Criminal Psychology | Ongoing Trials | Expert Analysis Multiple new episodes every day! Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski is your ultimate daily true crime podcast , bringing you real-time updates on criminal investigations, high-profile trials, forensic breakthroughs, and psychological deep dives into the minds of killers. 🎙️ Hosted by veteran journalist Tony Brueski , we go beyond the headlines , featuring exclusive insights from FBI agents, forensic experts, criminal psychologists, and legal analysts. Whether it's the latest developments in cases like Bryan Kohberger and Lori Vallow or deep dives into cold cases and unsolved mysteries , we uncover the hidden truths behind the crimes that captivate the world. If you’re obsessed with true crime, forensic psychology, and legal drama , subscribe now to Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski on Apple Podcasts. 🎧 New episodes multiple times a day—stay ahead of the latest crime stories. Join our SubStack: https://HiddenKillers.SubStack.com 📺Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod 📷Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillersp…","last_synced_at":"2026-07-18T10:21:06.423335+00:00","page_url":"https://stenobird.com/podcast/hidden-killers-with-tony-brueski-true-crime-news-commentary-5840426"},"episode":{"title":"Why Didn't Mackenzie Shirilla's Defense Call The One Expert Who Could Have Changed Everything?","slug":"why-didn-t-mackenzie-shirilla-s-defense-call-the-one-expert-who-could-have-changed-everything","published_at":"2026-06-07T01:00:00+00:00","page_url":"https://stenobird.com/podcast/hidden-killers-with-tony-brueski-true-crime-news-commentary-5840426/why-didn-t-mackenzie-shirilla-s-defense-call-the-one-expert-who-could-have-changed-everything","show_page_url":"https://stenobird.com/podcast/hidden-killers-with-tony-brueski-true-crime-news-commentary-5840426","url":"https://audioboom.com/posts/8912881","audio_url":"https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/audioboom.com/posts/8912881.mp3?modified=1780669215&sid=5040505&source=rss","summary":"The defense raised a medical condition that could have explained the Strongsville crash. Then they never called an expert to testify about it. No medical records entered. No testimony. The prosecution's intent narrative went unchallenged on the point that could have introduced reasonable doubt — and a jury never heard an alternative explanation for why the car hit that building at nearly a hundred miles per hour. After Mackenzie Shirilla was convicted of four counts of murder for the crash that killed Dominic Russo and Davion Flanagan, a neurologist reviewed her records and found evidence consistent with a medical episode — loss of consciousness, no head trauma, low blood oxygen. That opinion was submitted in a post-conviction petition. The court denied it. Not because the medical evidence lacked merit — the filing arrived one day past Ohio's 365-day statutory deadline. The failures compound. The prosecution presented an I-71 incident as proof of prior calculation — a friend testified Mackenzie threatened to crash the car. Text messages showed Mackenzie told Dominic's mother that Dom was the one who grabbed the wheel. Two versions of the same moment. The defense didn't challenge the prosecution's account. The prosecution's forensic examiner testified to no mechanical failure. The defense brought no accident reconstruction expert to offer an alternative reading of the physical evidence. Criminal defense attorney Bob Motta examines each failure and whether the cumulative weight meets the standard for ineffective assistance of counsel. The question isn't only whether Mackenzie is guilty — it's whether she was ever given the tools to mount a real defense. Robin Dreeke brings FBI behavioral expertise to the competing narratives. Netflix's documentary shows Mackenzie soft-sp…","meta_description":"The defense raised a medical condition that could have explained the Strongsville crash. Then they never called an expert to testify about it. No medical…","key_points":[],"chapters":[],"topics":[],"duration_seconds":2875,"processing_state":"not_requested","actions":[{"name":"request_transcript","method":"POST","url":"https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/hidden-killers-with-tony-brueski-true-crime-news-commentary-5840426/episodes/why-didn-t-mackenzie-shirilla-s-defense-call-the-one-expert-who-could-have-changed-everything/transcription-requests","description":"Idempotently request low-priority transcript generation for this episode."},{"name":"read_markdown","method":"GET","url":"https://stenobird.com/podcast/hidden-killers-with-tony-brueski-true-crime-news-commentary-5840426/why-didn-t-mackenzie-shirilla-s-defense-call-the-one-expert-who-could-have-changed-everything.md","description":"Read the agent-friendly Markdown representation of this episode resource."}]}}