{"podcast":{"title":"CLEs You Actually Want to Hear","slug":"cles-you-actually-want-to-hear-7072333","podcast_index_feed_id":7072333,"rss_url":"https://media.rss.com/cle-you-actually-want-to-hear/feed.xml","website_url":"https://www.bhba.org/podcasts","image_url":"https://media.rss.com/cle-you-actually-want-to-hear/20241028_071010_9970bd3553955f2125f5159fec0f4ba0.png","author":"Beverly Hills Bar Association","episode_count":444,"summary":"Listen to Beverly Hills Bar Association's nationally recognized CLE content, featuring timely topics and speakers from across the country. You don’t need to be an attorney to tune in, but if you are, you’ll get CLE credit while you listen! Full details at www.bhba.org/podcasts .","last_synced_at":"2026-09-21T22:18:35.705353+00:00","page_url":"https://stenobird.com/podcast/cles-you-actually-want-to-hear-7072333"},"episode":{"title":"California Evidence Law Update: The Court Decisions That Shaped 2025","slug":"california-evidence-law-update-the-court-decisions-that-shaped-2025","published_at":"2026-09-14T14:00:00+00:00","page_url":"https://stenobird.com/podcast/cles-you-actually-want-to-hear-7072333/california-evidence-law-update-the-court-decisions-that-shaped-2025","show_page_url":"https://stenobird.com/podcast/cles-you-actually-want-to-hear-7072333","url":"https://rss.com/podcasts/cle-you-actually-want-to-hear/3069383","audio_url":"https://content.rss.com/episodes/294811/3069383/cle-you-actually-want-to-hear/2026_08_14_22_01_54_9aab5512-bf21-48c8-a086-2593339362ef.mp3","summary":"There were no statutory changes to the California Evidence Code in 2025. The courts made up for it. Eileen A. Scallen, Professor of Practice at UCLA School of Law and co-author of the California Evidence Courtroom Manual, walks through the year's most consequential rulings and what they mean for trial practice. The program covers the retroactivity of Section 352.2 and the admissibility of creative expression evidence. It examines when a criminal defendant's character becomes fair game to rebut evidence of a victim's character under Section 1103(b), along with the latest confrontation clause questions arising under Sanchez. On the Court of Appeal side, Scallen addresses hearsay in Domestic Violence Prevention Act and family law proceedings, expert testimony qualification standards, evidentiary privileges, and evidence in Penal Code Section 1172.6 resentencing. Audio versions of Beverly Hills Bar Association programs are eligible for Self-Study CLE credit in California. Visit www.bhba.org/podcasts for more information.","meta_description":"There were no statutory changes to the California Evidence Code in 2025. The courts made up for it. Eileen A. Scallen, Professor of Practice at UCLA Schoo…","key_points":[],"chapters":[],"topics":[],"duration_seconds":3411,"processing_state":"not_requested","actions":[{"name":"request_transcript","method":"POST","url":"https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/cles-you-actually-want-to-hear-7072333/episodes/california-evidence-law-update-the-court-decisions-that-shaped-2025/transcription-requests","description":"Idempotently request low-priority transcript generation for this episode."},{"name":"read_markdown","method":"GET","url":"https://stenobird.com/podcast/cles-you-actually-want-to-hear-7072333/california-evidence-law-update-the-court-decisions-that-shaped-2025.md","description":"Read the agent-friendly Markdown representation of this episode resource."}]}}