# Why Spend Millions Retrying Murdaugh If He's Already Locked Up Forever? Page: https://stenobird.com/podcast/the-re-trial-of-alex-murdaugh-5989088/why-spend-millions-retrying-murdaugh-if-he-s-already-locked-up-forever Text version: https://stenobird.com/podcast/the-re-trial-of-alex-murdaugh-5989088/why-spend-millions-retrying-murdaugh-if-he-s-already-locked-up-forever.md Podcast: [The Re-Trial Of Alex Murdaugh](https://stenobird.com/podcast/the-re-trial-of-alex-murdaugh-5989088) Published: 2026-05-26T01:00:00+00:00 Episode link: https://audioboom.com/posts/8906870 Audio file: https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/audioboom.com/posts/8906870.mp3?modified=1779457558&sid=5097527&source=rss Processing state: not_requested JSON: https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/the-re-trial-of-alex-murdaugh-5989088/episodes/why-spend-millions-retrying-murdaugh-if-he-s-already-locked-up-forever Duration seconds: 1819 ## Resource Alex Murdaugh is 57. He's serving 40 years federal. He's never getting out. So why spend millions on a retrial? Because Maggie Murdaugh was 52. Paul Murdaugh was 22. They were shot to death on their family's property. And right now, nobody stands convicted of killing them. The guilty verdicts are erased. The life sentences are vacated. Not because the evidence wasn't there — because an elected court clerk corrupted the process. A financial crimes sentence is not a murder conviction by proxy. Accepting it as one tells the families of Maggie and Paul that the question of who killed them doesn't matter enough to answer properly. Five days after the Supreme Court's unanimous reversal, Murdaugh's defense team sued Becky Hill in federal court. Seventeen pages. Section 1983. Six hundred thousand dollars in damages going to the receivership. Jim Griffin said the money isn't the point — the point is subpoena power, depositions, and dragging people under oath to answer what the state never asked. The Supreme Court ruled Hill put "her fingers on the scales of justice." The state prosecutor said there wasn't enough to charge her with jury tampering. Four months later, the Supreme Court said that's exactly what she did. Eric Faddis breaks down the lawsuit, what civil discovery gives the defense that the criminal process never did, and why Griffin stressed none of the money goes to Murdaugh personally. He explains what Section 1983 requires and whether the discovery could reveal Hill didn't act alone. Now the Attorney General is reportedly considering the death penalty. People Murdaugh stole from have said they'll testify again. The retrial isn't about adjusting a sentence he's already serving. It's about accountability for two people who were killed and a legal record that currentl… ## Actions - request_transcript: `POST https://stenobird.com/v1/public/podcasts/the-re-trial-of-alex-murdaugh-5989088/episodes/why-spend-millions-retrying-murdaugh-if-he-s-already-locked-up-forever/transcription-requests` — Idempotently request low-priority transcript generation for this episode. - read_markdown: `GET https://stenobird.com/podcast/the-re-trial-of-alex-murdaugh-5989088/why-spend-millions-retrying-murdaugh-if-he-s-already-locked-up-forever.md` — Read the agent-friendly Markdown representation of this episode resource. A page view does not enqueue transcription. Agents should invoke `request_transcript` explicitly when they need this episode processed. ## Transcript Full transcripts are not published on public pages unless there is a clear rights basis.